Circular Economy & EPR Compliance Solutions

Back to Areas of Expertise

Recycled content is becoming a mandated demand, but making it commercially viable depends on what happens inside the processing line, not just on securing the material. The EU packaging regulation is introducing binding recycled-content requirements from 2030, making recyclability a condition of market placement.

At the same time, EPR schemes are increasingly linking fees to recyclability and recycled content. Meeting these requirements will depend heavily on processing economics. Re-pulping yield loss and de-inking on the fiber side, and washing, melt-filtration and decontamination on the plastics side can materially change the cost of converting post-consumer material.

Feedstock consistency adds another challenge. Recovered material needs to meet defined quality and volume requirements if manufacturers are to run it reliably. That makes feedstock stability as much an operations issue as a procurement one.

Recycled-content targets are often set before the conversion economics are understood. In the cases Stellarix has assessed, processing losses could have a greater effect on the economics of post-consumer content than the quoted recyclate price itself. Variations in fiber processing and plastics processing can quickly widen the cost gap. Inconsistent feedstock creates another problem: production lines designed around a defined material specification can become harder to operate when recovered inputs vary.

Reverse logistics is often left outside the business case as well. Yet the collection, consolidation, and return of usable material can determine whether a recycled-content program has a dependable feedstock base in the first place. That makes reverse logistics a precondition, not an afterthought, a credible business case must establish:

What post-consumer recycled content actually costs after re-pulping yield, de-inking, and melt-filtration are factored in
Where feedstock quality and availability are reliable enough to support consistent production
How reverse-logistics networks can maintain the flow of specified recovered material back to manufacturing
Where EPR fee differences make recyclability and recycled-content investments commercially attractive

Stellarix works with converters, brand owners, and recyclers to connect recycled-content commitments with the economics of processing and supply. Our work covers recycled-content sourcing and cost modeling, re-pulping and de-inking efficiency, melt-filtration economics, reverse-logistics design, and EPR exposure. We are helping investors, waste operators, and other stakeholders improve their recovery economics, reduce stranded capital risks, and strengthen their overall network performance through catchment analysis, capacity optimization roadmaps, and diversion pathway designs.

Our Experience:

Developed a collection and consolidation model for a brand owner seeking more consistent recovered material, improving the reliability of feedstock supplied to manufacturing.
Evaluated recovered-material quality and supply risks for a packaging manufacturer preparing for the 2030 recycled-content requirements, identifying where additional sourcing measures were needed.