California’s latest debate on mandating bi-directional charging capability in EVs brings with it the long-discussed predicament of its impact on EV batteries. In the last two decades, various theories and pilot projects have delved deep into this matter. Most agreed that the strategic implementation of V2G technologies would yield fruitful results for EV owners, makers, and the grid. While the widespread assumption degrades the reliability and durability of batteries, several ideas and theories propose to neutralize these adverse effects and make the most of the energy stored in EV batteries that may otherwise go to waste. But how viable is that idea, and will it finally lead to the proposed results? Let’s take a closer look to understand it better.

What Are V2G Technologies?

V2G or Vehicle-To-Grid technologies mediate the reciprocal power flow from EVs to another recipient. The list of recipients may include a grid, a microgrid, or an entity as small as a building. Successful application of these systems can mitigate the most significant challenges of renewable energy resources – intermittency and demand-supply unpredictability. As a power prospect, V2G is an imminent part of the highly recommended virtual power plants that aggregate distributed energy resources to stabilize electricity demand and supply to and from the power grid. When applied, V2G systems will play a key role in enhancing renewable energy adoption, grid stability, and optimization of grid upgrade costs. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the chances of its successful implementation along with plausible solutions that may help overcome its biggest roadblocks.

Studies And Theories Favoring V2G Implementation

The Arrhenius Plot Of Logarithmic Capacity Fades vs. reciprocal Temperatures For Cells Aged At 90%, 50%, and 20% SoC
Figure 1: The Arrhenius Plot Of Logarithmic Capacity Fades vs. reciprocal Temperatures For Cells Aged At 90%, 50%, and 20% SoC (PC: K. Uddin et al.)
Hawaii University Study Conclusion Slide Showing Impact Of Blind Bidirectional Charging Vs. Intelligent Charging Impact Analysis
Figure 2: Hawaii University Study Conclusion Slide Showing Impact Of Blind Bidirectional Charging Vs. Intelligent Charging Impact Analysis (PC: Uddin, Marongiu et al)

Other Studies and Theories

Average Daily CO2 Import Vs. Three V2G Scenarios For Varied Locations In Britain
Figure 3: Average Daily CO2 Import Vs. Three V2G Scenarios For Varied Locations In Britain (PC: Cenex)

The Roadblocks

Despite unanimous support for the intelligent implementation of bi-directional charging, several questions challenge its deployment in real time. Here are the biggest roadblocks:

Some Big Issues

Algorithm Employed By BMS and Smart-Grid To Assess The Level Of V2G Services That Needs To Be Implemented
Figure 4: Algorithm Employed By BMS and Smart-Grid To Assess The Level Of V2G Services That Needs To Be Implemented (PC: Warwick University)

Additional Issues

Final Words

Acknowledging the challenges mentioned above paves the path for further investigation and the successful neutralization of those challenges. Solving the complex equation between ambient temperature, SoC, and degradation determines the progress. Similarly, most research has yet to be conducted in the context of the fleet. We need to establish further evidence for other modes of transport. However, one thing is certain: the momentum in this direction will increase as the demand for EVs rises. Industry stakeholders will systematically address and resolve the challenges and dilemmas associated with V2G, V2I, V2H, and all V2X in due course.